2024 In-Depth Report on Local Payments for Chinese Enterprises Going Global: Status, Drivers, and Challenges
This report examines the critical role of local payments for Chinese enterprises going global, highlighting the fragmentation of local payment methods across markets, analyzing drivers such as user habits, regulation, and technology, and offering strategic recommendations.

Current Status: Fragmentation and Mainstream Trends in Local Payments
One of the primary challenges for Chinese enterprises going global is the extreme fragmentation of the payment ecosystem. In Southeast Asia, major e-wallets vary by country: GoPay, OVO, and DANA in Indonesia; GCash and PayMaya in the Philippines; TrueMoney Wallet in Thailand; MoMo in Vietnam, etc. In Africa, M-Pesa dominates in Kenya, Tanzania, and other East African countries, while Orange Money is prevalent in West Africa. In Latin America, Brazil's Pix (instant payment system) has become the daily payment of choice, Mexico's OXXO cash payments remain strong, and Argentina relies heavily on credit card installments (Cuotas).
Even in developed countries, credit cards are still mainstream in the US, but digital wallets like Apple Pay and PayPal are growing rapidly; Europe favors local payment methods such as SEPA direct debit, iDEAL (Netherlands), and Sofort (Germany).
Drivers: User Habits, Regulatory Dividends, and Technological Innovation
- User Habit Stickiness: Consumers in different markets have strong preferences for payment methods. For example, Brazilian users prefer Pix (over 160 million users in 2024), Indonesian users rely heavily on e-wallets and bank transfers, and Filipino users favor cash and GCash. If enterprises do not integrate mainstream local payments, conversion rates can drop by over 60%.
- Regulatory Environment Differences: Countries have varying requirements for cross-border and local payments. For instance, Indonesia requires payment service providers to obtain licenses and mandates data localization; India promotes the unified payment interface UPI and requires foreign enterprises to access it through local partnerships. Regulation creates both barriers and compliance opportunities.
- Technological Innovation Push: Open Banking and API aggregation platforms enable enterprises to connect multiple local payment methods through a single interface. For example, global payment service providers like Stripe and Adyen have integrated many local payments, but Chinese enterprises still need to choose whether to rely on local payment service providers (such as Xendit in Southeast Asia or Flutterwave in Africa) or build their own payment capabilities.
Challenges: Compliance Risks, Costs, and User Experience
- Compliance Risks: AML and KYC requirements vary by market and change rapidly. For example, the Philippine central bank is tightening regulations on e-wallets, and Indonesia requires payment data to be stored locally. Enterprises must continuously invest in legal and compliance resources.
- High Integration and Operating Costs: Integrating multiple local payment methods involves gateway fees, capital costs due to settlement cycle differences, and technical development and maintenance investments. For SMEs, costs may offset market opportunities.
- User Experience Consistency: The back-end processes of different payment methods (such as payment confirmation, refunds, and dispute handling) vary greatly, making it difficult to provide a unified experience. For example, cash payments (Mexico's OXXO) require offline payment, which is complex and difficult to refund.
Recommendations: Layered Strategy and Ecosystem Collaboration
- Priority Setting: Based on user payment habit data in target markets, prioritize integrating the top 2-3 local payment methods by market share. For example, in Brazil, prioritize PayPal, Boleto, and Pix; in Indonesia, prioritize GoPay, OVO, and bank transfers.
- Leverage Aggregation Platforms: Choose regional payment aggregators such as 2C2P or NAGA Pay to reduce integration complexity; simultaneously partner with global players like Adyen or Airwallex to cover multiple markets.
- Build Local Compliance Teams: Hire local payment experts or collaborate with compliance advisors in each key market to track regulatory developments in real time.
- Monitor Emerging Trends: Stablecoin payments (e.g., USDC usage in Latin America) and central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots (e.g., Nigeria's eNaira) – prepare for the future.
Related content

B2B Fintech Market Comparison: China, Southeast Asia & Latin America (2019-2023)
Over the past five years, China's B2B fintech market has led in size but slowed in growth, while Southeast Asia and Latin America have grown rapidly but remain at an early stage.
Top 5 Chinese B2B Fintech Cross-Border Transaction Volume in 2024

2024 In-depth Analysis of China's B2B Finance Going Global: Status, Drivers, and Future Path
Based on public data and industry observations, this article analyzes the development trends, key drivers, major challenges of China's B2B finance going global in 2024, and provides recommendations.